Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Sweet Jesus!

  • Sep. 3rd, 2008 at 7:33 PM
fisherman
So the corn industry has commercials and even a damn website heralding the greatness of "all natural" high fructose corn syrup. It's atrocious, it reminds me if the Carbon dioxide is life! pro-pollution (er, anti-global warming alarmism) commercials that were around a couple of years ago. "We are big business, and with our gobs of cash we promise to help you help us make more gobs of cash." Anyway...

Just for fun, lets compare what goes into production of regular sugar vs. corn syrup.

Sugar Production entails:
*Crush sugar cane, extract and filter juice.
*Treat with lime to neutralize and remove impurities.
*Boil for a bit
*Remove sediment from the bottom, skim off the gunk on top
*Cool/evaporate and remove syrup to get crystals.
*Use as is (raw), or make white refined sugar we all have in our kitchen with additional filtering of impurities using something like charcoal.

HFCS production entails:
*Steep corn for a couple days, it ferments a bit.
*Separate Germ from Endosperm
*Grind the above seperately.
*Remove starch from each by washing.
*Separate starch from gluten and dry it.
*Cornstarch is treated with alpha-amylase to produce oligosaccharides (shorter chains of sugars)
*Glucoamylase breaks the sugar chains down even further to yield the simple sugar glucose.
*Xylose isomerase (aka glucose isomerase) converts glucose to a mixture of about 42% fructose and 50–52% glucose with some other sugars mixed in.

Which could you do completely on your own, without, say, a chemist? Which sounds more "natural" to you?

Edit: I completely forgot honey! Here's how you make honey (after the bees are done workiing): remove honey from honeycomb, strain (gets out the chunks), filter (optional - high-pressure with fine filter - gets out the pollen but also some nutrients), done. How's that for natural?

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]coendou wrote:
Sep. 4th, 2008 02:28 am (UTC)
You forgot the last step in cane sugar production:

*Pay huge tariffs because you're not made of corn

And the first step in HFCS production:

*Get lots of government subsidies to pay for your huge amounts of surplus crops that you've got to convince people to eat
[info]llamadragon wrote:
Sep. 4th, 2008 03:26 pm (UTC)
Yeah, there's that too, but in my "which could you do yourself" scenario I wasn't sure how you would go about taxing or subsidizing yourself so I opted to leave it out. :)
[info]thist wrote:
Sep. 4th, 2008 12:19 pm (UTC)
You know more about this than me, but it sure sounds like HFCS takes a lot more resources to create. Perhaps an argument could be made that HFCS is a bigger waste of our limited energy resources and a contributor to global warming... I mean in comparison to sugar.
[info]llamadragon wrote:
Sep. 4th, 2008 03:24 pm (UTC)
Yup. As the guy in the book put it, we're no longer relying on farmers to produce food, we're relying on energy to process raw material into something we can digest.

The corn we grow so much of isn't even good for eating, it's designed to be incredibly starchy and, as a result, tastes like crap. And it's so not related to food that they can leave it in huge piles outside in the elements for a long time but still process it "safely" into corn syrup or one of a billion other corn derivatives.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

January 2009
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow